IAmOnetruth – Thoughtful Sharing of Truth on Religion with Comments on Health, Philosophy, Politics and more…

Christmas – It’s that time of year again!

December 12th, 2007 by Administrator
Merry Christmas! 
I received an email from a ”well meaning” Christian, expressing the opinion that as loving Christians we should not defend our right to “public displays” of our Faith. The email was set as a “Letter from God”. I believe the “letter” came from further “south” of “heaven”. 
     

The Letter said, among other things that Christmas, while being a celebration of the Birthday of Christ was originally set on the date of a “pagan holiday”. As though that makes it alright not to defend our right to public displays of our Faith. I ask; “How so”?
     

Then the letter goes on to say we should rather live a life of love, again, somehow suggesting that we do not need to defend our rights to a public display because we are living the Christian calling. Which, of course, every Christian should be doing regardless of this issue.
     

This brings up a “sore point” among Christians, that being, whether Christians need to love at all? Actually, Jesus, St. Paul and the early Church stated love is necessary for salvation… [see: http://www.iamonetruth.com/all_you_need_is_love.htm ]
     

The “letter” finally states that as God He does not need our help.
[Don't forget; I am God and can take care of Myself. ]
     

This statement reminds me of a statue in New York City. The statue is in front of St. Nicholas of Tollentine Catholic Church in The Bronx, it is of Jesus Christ with His hands outstretched.  The statue has been vandalized and the hands of Christ were broken off. Some enterprising person placed a sign around the neck of Jesus that read: “I have no hands but yours”.
     

Think about it! God can take care of Himself, but He expects us to do His work here on earth.
Be careful… we can be loving… caring Christians and still stand up in the public arena for Christ!
Pope John Paul II said; “today religious freedom must be upheld and defended against those who would remove religion from the public domain and make secularism America’s faith” [Homily at Oriole Park, Baltimore, 1995] [ENVOY Magazine]

 

For more on the celebration of the Feast of Christmas.

If you read down to the very bottom of the New Advent information you will see that Protestants did not always celebrate Christmas. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03724b.htm
 
Here is more information that proves although Protestants refused to celebrate Christmas in England in 1644 it was indeed a Feast for Christians for centuries!
http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/1991/9112cust.asp

Posted in Religion and Philosophy | No Comments

Halloween – It is that time of the year again.

October 11th, 2007 by Administrator

The following is a reply to a misinformed ‘post’ on myspace…

You are a loving Christian lady and I respect that… but “Halloween” comes from the term “All Hallows Eve” or “All Saints Eve”. The original celebration of All Saints Eve was in honor of all the Christians that have led exemplary lives and gone before us… you know, the “cloud of witnesses” [Heb. 12:1] that St. Paul speaks of.

Yet, it is true, that satan has taken it over [a Christian practice] and made it something evil. So, I agree that we can find other things to do at that time. For example, there is a Catholic tradition [small 't'], that suggests children and even adults dressing up as figures from the Bible and play acting that others can guess who they are supposed to be. This is quite fun as I have done the same myself.

Excerpt from This Rock online magazine

Can Catholics Celebrate Halloween?

Q: Some families in our parish don’t allow their children to celebrate Halloween. Should Catholics celebrate Halloween?

A: The word Halloween is a contraction for All Hallows Eve, which, before the reform of the liturgical calendar following the Second Vatican Council, was the vigil of All Saints and All Souls Days. As such, Halloween can be considered a Christian holiday. As with many Christian holidays, the secular world has attached its own traditions to the day (costumes, trick-or-treating, parties) that are not intrinsically wrong but can become problematic when the religious meaning of the holiday is set aside or forgotten.

For more information:

http://www.americancatholic.org/Features/Halloween/

Christianity has started many traditions that have been handed from one generation to the next. Secular society tries to take them and make them non-Christian, such as we can see with taking “Christ” out of Christmas. Should Christians give in to this approach?

I am sure you would agree that Christians need to, “test everything, holding to what is good”, 1 Thess 5.

Christianity saw a pagan festival and decided to end the practice and replace it with something good and holy. That ‘held’ for centuries, until modern society decided to uproot the good tradition and make it bad… with satan smiling the whole time… as Christians oppose each other.

Christians should not oppose each other on this… just hold fast to what is good. Remember Christ’s prayer for the ‘unity of the believers’ the night before He died. [Jn. 17:21]

I am sorry this is long, but just giving you a small amount of information didn’t seem the right thing to do.

Your friend in Christ;

Philip

Posted in Religion and Philosophy | 3 Comments

Discussion With A Loving Lady

August 12th, 2007 by Administrator

The setting is a restaurant overlooking the water in St. Augustine. A meal and good conversation. The lady does not practice her Catholic Faith anymore and is seeking validation of her poor view of The Catholic Church. Perhaps, even, she might be seeking to enlighten me on the evils of The Catholic Church.

She didn’t realize that God, “has a better idea”!

First she brought up “The Inquisition”.

She opened our conversation with; “How about the atrocities that were perpetrated by The Catholic Church during The Spanish Inquisition?”
I think that her question to me could be construed as; “How could I think that the Catholic Church was a loving, caring organization in light of the torture devices used in interrogations, such as the Iron Maiden, by The Inquisition?”.

I gave a brief but succinct answer that I knew a truly loving person could accept.
I answered:
1.) The Catholic Church bases all their teachings on two criteria.
A) Love of God
B) Love of self and love of neighbor.

2.) I said to her that she would agree with my next statement.
I told her that it is unfair to judge a civilization of a different time period by the standards of today. She looked thoughtful, for a moment, then agreed.

I then pointed out that there are writings from that time period; of people who, actually, petitioned the secular courts whom they were brought before for crimes, such as stealing, to allow them to be tried by The Inquisition, because, at the time, The Inquisition was known to be fair and lenient.

3.) I pointed out that there is much misinformation about The Inquisition. I told her that years ago one “anti-Catholic” author put the statistic in his book, about The Inquisition, that 95 Million people were killed. When, in reality, there were not 95 Million people in all of Spain at the time of The Spanish Inquisition. But, many authors who wrote after that book was published used this man’s mis-information without checking the validity of his statement.

For more on this subject:
The Inquisition – “This Rock” – http://www.catholic.com/library/inquisition.asp
“What’s So Great About Catholicism” – By. H.W. Crocker III – “Did this Inquisition of the 13th century strike fear into the people of western Europe? No. Its scope was limited; its trials and punishments more lenient to the accused than were those of its secular counterparts. Inquisitional punishment was often no more than the sort of penance—charity, pilgrimage, mortification—that one might be given by a priest in a confessional.”   http://www.crisismagazine.com/november2002/feature6.htm

Posted in Religion and Philosophy | 2 Comments

Harry Potter’s Back!

July 22nd, 2007 by Administrator

 

 

Why Harry Potter Goes Awry - Zenit

harry potter alert

 

Reasonable Christian parents would not permit their children to read a series of enthralling books depicting likable young people involved in drug-dealing, or premarital sex, or torture. We would not give our children fiction in which a group of “good fornicators” struggled against a set of “bad fornicators.” Why, then, have we accepted a set of books which glamorize and normalize occult activity, even though it is every bit as deadly to the soul as sexual sin, if not more so? 

 For more Catholic views on “Harry”:

Catholic Educator’s Resource: Here are links to several articles.

Rome’s chief excorcist warns parents against Harry Potter

My personal view is:

Suppose there is a “NEW” discovery for space travel.

Everyone can now go to the Moon cheap. But, there is a controversy. A famed Rocket Scientist, an expert in his field says that the craft that carries everyone on this journey isn’t safe.

However, everyone you know is signing up to go. You want to go. You are like eveyone else, it is “new” and “everyone is doing it”.

But, you don’t want to take a chance with the safety of your family or your own. Your friends try to convince you that it safe by quoting experts of their own. There is even a local ‘car mechanic’ who checked the craft over and he says that it is fine. Eveyone knows him as a man of integrity, why would he say the craft isn’t safe if it was not?

I am going with the “expert” (in this case Fr. Gabriel Amorth – the leading Exorcist in Rome – an expert in the field in question), he says “that Satan is behind the works”.

My question to anyone who would take this kind of chance with their family’s Salvation is; “With so much good, safe, Christian reading available today, why would you read something that might take you & your family away from God?”

“Why?”

Posted in Religion and Philosophy | 4 Comments

Bible says that we have to “Holy” to get to heaven

June 24th, 2007 by Administrator

The Bible says that we have to "Holy" to get to Heaven, to be with God for all eternity. [Hebrews 12:14]

(DRB) Follow peace with all men and holiness: without which no man shall see God.
(ISV) Pursue peace with everyone, as well as holiness, without which no one will see the Lord.
(KJV) Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:
(KJV+) Follow1377 peace1515 with3326 all3956 men, and2532 holiness,38 without5565 which3739 no man3762 shall see3700 the3588 Lord:2962
(NAB) Strive for peace with everyone, and for that holiness without which no one will see the Lord.
(NASB) Pursue peace with all men, and the sanctification without which no one will see the Lord.
(RSVA) Strive for peace with all men, and for the holiness without which no one will see the Lord.

I prefer the RASV & the NAB versions because of the word "strive" for peace… strive for Holiness. The word "follow" in the King James and the Douay Rhiems seems to imply that, at least in the modern mind, that holiness is an easy thing to accomplish.

However the word "strive" or even the word "pursue" from the NASB would lead the reader to understand that getting into Heaven is not an easy thing because they must "strive" for their entrance into the "Promised Land".

What exactly does the word "strive" mean?

"To exert much effort or energy" from WordWeb

Then one would wonder, "How does someone become "Holy"?"

The Bible says that God is, "Holy, Holy, Holy". [Is. 6:3; Rev. 4:8]. The bible also says that; "God is love". [1 Jn. 4:8, 16]

So, a simple explanation of, "How does someone become Holy?", would be; to grow in the Virtue of Love.

"only the love of charity, agape, makes the Christian perfect" [ "Mary Our Perfect Mother", by Fr. Bartholomew Ansu, CMC, p. 26]

Let me put this altogether.

"Strive" for the Virtue of Love, "without which no one will see the Lord".

What is Love?

1 Cor 13:4 Love is patient, love is kind. It is not jealous, (love) is not pompous, it is not inflated, 5 it is not rude, it does not seek its own interests, it is not quick-tempered, it does not brood over injury, 6 it does not rejoice over wrongdoing but rejoices with the truth. 7 It bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. [NAB] [E-Sword]

1 Cor 13:13 So faith, hope, love remain, these three; but the greatest of these is love.

Posted in evolution | 3 Comments

Contempt for human life, acted on, is a Mortal Sin.

June 20th, 2007 by Administrator

VATICAN CITY – The Vatican on Tuesday issued a “Ten Commandments” for motorists to keep them on the road to salvation, warning drivers against the sins of road rage, abuse of alcohol or even simple rudeness.   http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070619/ap_on_re_eu/vatican_road_rage

I had a discussion with a friend of mine on the preceding article.

When I read the article I sent him a, little known, teaching from the Catechism of The Catholic Church (CCC), that speeding can be a mortal sin. http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p3s2c2a5.htm#II

2290 The virtue of temperance disposes us to avoid every kind of excess: the abuse of food, alcohol, tobacco, or medicine. Those incur grave guilt who, by drunkenness or a love of speed, endanger their own and others’ safety on the road, at sea, or in the air.

Here is what he sent me, in reply.

“BUT to drive recklessly is a mortal sin???   that is sick!   all my life i thought a mortal sin was an XTRTEMELY serious infraction like nothing short of murder. u know something that only the worst of the worst could ever possibly commit. But thanks to your quoting of the catlic chrch “rules” i feel “mortal” sins have been cheapened to the point of making them meaningless.  i mean to put murder, & rape in the same category as reckless driving and adultry is to me just ridiculous and further degrades the chrches credibility in my book.
sorry but i had to say it after u said it was a mortal sin…… all i asked was if ya think the popes driver always obeys the limit and not speaking of emergencies,”

This is what I have to say to anyone who may think as my friend does. When mankind holds the lives, health and welfare of other humans in contempt that is a “grave” – “mortal” (as the Bible puts it, 1 John 5:16-17; James 1:15), sin. If I through my own lack of respect for another person’s dignity and welfare, use that person’s body in a sinful contemptuous way then it is a Mortal Sin. If some one has a contemptuous attitude for those around him and drives recklessly so as to endanger their lives needlessly, then it is a Mortal Sin.

To take human life or to use human life with contempt is a “grave” offense against God!

To quote my friend again: “all my life i thought a mortal sin was an XTRTEMELY serious infraction like nothing short of murder”

Treating those around you as though they were nothing more then a rag to sop up the dirt on your garage floor, is an “extremely serious infraction”!

Here are some other statements from the CCC that may help to clarify God’s teaching.

2269 The fifth commandment forbids doing anything with the intention of indirectly bringing about a person’s death. The moral law prohibits exposing someone to mortal danger without grave reason, as well as refusing assistance to a person in danger.

Unintentional killing is not morally imputable. But one is not exonerated from grave offense if, without proportionate reasons, he has acted in a way that brings about someone’s death, even without the intention to do so.

For more on this subject: Highway to Heaven, DAVID GIBSON

The Light from The Son, hurt’s the eyes of those who wish to remain in Darkness!

Posted in Religion and Philosophy | 2 Comments

The FDA Nevers Sleeps…

June 18th, 2007 by Administrator

The fact that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) never sleeps should be a cause of our peace of mind, but people concerned for their health know differently.

It seems that they are at it again to make our food supply more dangerous. They want to change the labeling of certain foods that have been “irradiated” to “pasteurized”. Read more in an article by Erin Rosas, Pasteurized ?  Preposterous!“, local Organic Grocers in Ocala, Florida.

“Grass fed beef can’t contain the specific kinds of E-coli that make humans sick, we protested!”

-

For more information on this important subject read here…  an article from The New York Times “Power Steer” By MICHAEL POLLAN

Here are some excerpts that may be of interest.

“We have come to think of ”cornfed” as some kind of old-fashioned virtue; we
shouldn’t. Granted, a cornfed cow develops well-marbled flesh, giving it a taste
and texture American consumers have learned to like. Yet this meat is
demonstrably less healthy to eat, since it contains more saturated fat. A recent
study in The European Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that the meat of
grass-fed livestock not only had substantially less fat than grain-fed meat but that
the type of fats found in grass-fed meat were much healthier. (Grass-fed meat
has more omega 3 fatty acids and fewer omega 6, which is believed to promote
heart disease; it also contains betacarotine and CLA, another ”good” fat.) A
growing body of research suggests that many of the health problems associated
with eating beef are really problems with cornfed beef. In the same way
ruminants have not evolved to eat grain, humans may not be well adapted to
eating grain-fed animals. Yet the U.S.D.A.’s grading system continues to reward
marbling — that is, intermuscular fat — and thus the feeding of corn to cows.”
[...]

“I thought about the deep pile of manure that No. 534 and I were standing in. We
don’t know much about the hormones in it — where they will end up or what
they might do once they get there — but we do know something about the
bacteria. One particularly lethal bug most probably resided in the manure
beneath my feet. Escherichia coli 0157 is a relatively new strain of a common
intestinal bacteria (it was first isolated in the 1980′s) that is common in feedlot
cattle, more than half of whom carry it in their guts. Ingesting as few as 10 of
these microbes can cause a fatal infection.”

“Most of the microbes that reside in the gut of a cow and find their way into our
food get killed off by the acids in our stomachs, since they originally adapted to
live in a neutral-pH environment. But the digestive tract of the modern feedlot
cow is closer in acidity to our own, and in this new, manmade environment acidresistant
strains of E. coli have developed that can survive our stomach acids –
and go on to kill us. By acidifying a cow’s gut with corn, we have broken down
one of our food chain’s barriers to infection. Yet this process can be reversed:
James Russell, a U.S.D.A. microbiologist, has discovered that switching a cow’s
diet from corn to hay in the final days before slaughter reduces the population of
E. coli 0157 in its manure by as much as 70 percent. Such a change, however, is
considered wildly impractical by the cattle industry.”

I hope that the information that I share is helpful for your healthy lifestyle.

I share information on my blog that should be a help to a healthy lifestyle both spiritually and physically.

Posted in Health | 2 Comments

Satiric comment on the collusion of the FDA with Big Pahrma

June 15th, 2007 by Administrator

Satiric comment on the collusion of the FDA with Big Pahrma

Cartoon by Mike Adams – for more information check out NewsTarget.com

Posted in Health, Politics | No Comments

Evolution Fact or -”Scientific Theory”?

May 28th, 2007 by Administrator

In an effort to provide the “open-minded” with scientific proof of the prevarication of Evolution I provide the following links.“Public television producers are clearly at odds with overwhelming public sentiment in favor of hearing all scientific sides of the debate [on evolution],” said Chapman, a former Director of the US Census Bureau.” For more information click here… http://www.reviewevolution.com/press/pressRelease_100Scientists.php

For the “home page” of “Discovery Institute” click here.

http://www.reviewevolution.com/

Apparently there is more than one “Discovery Institute” dealing with the Evolution question.

http://www.discovery.org/

From “This Rock” Catholic magazine.

“Theories, as followers of Ptolemy learned, may be true or false. They are provisional explanations based on observation and measurement, but they are distinct from incontrovertible truths.”

http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/1997/9703fea2.asp

12 Quotes from Leading Evolutionists

http://www.creationism.org/articles/quotes.htm

Intelligent Design Network

http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/

“Dumbing down is not an answer either. The Georgia Department of Education—faced by 35 Georgia scientists arguing for the academic freedom to teach the controversy (of the 300 in the U.S.)—decided to remove all references to “evolution” in science textbooks, and replace the term with “biological changes over time.”"

http://www.christianity.ca/news/social-issues/2004/03.001.html

“Darwinism, Design and Public Education” – instead of hiding the controversy… teach it.

http://www.darwinismanddesign.com/index.php

ALL I AM SAYING; “IS GIVE TRUTH A CHANCE”.

I read the following in an article; Evolution and Dissent, By: David K. DeWolf
Boston Globe
June 11, 2007

“The debate is over” really means, “My mind is made up. Don’t confuse me with the facts.”

I thought it appropo.

 

Posted in Religion and Philosophy, evolution | No Comments

New museum says dinosaurs were on Noah’s Ark

May 27th, 2007 by Administrator

A ‘pet peeve’ of mine is the teaching of ‘evolution’ as fact when,

IN FACT

it has never been proven!

It has never been proven! Don’t get me wrong… I am not a ‘dyed in the wool’ creationist either, but I think it an abomination that so called ’scientists’ can teach as fact something that is only a theory, that being, “evolution”. Any realistic, honest person who has studied both sides knows that evolution has, not only, never been proven, but many leading evolutionists totally disagree with each other. Evolution is a theory that should be taught as such!I am speaking here of public education, of course. What is taught in a private school is up to the teaching staff of the school.

”$27 million museum near Cincinnati has drawn snickers from media…” click here.

[Opponents argue that children who see the exhibits will be confused when they learn in school that the universe is 14 billion years old rather than 6,000.”Teachers don’t deserve a student coming into class saying ‘Gee Mrs. Brown, I went to this fancy museum and it said you’re teaching me a lie,”‘ Dr. Eugenie Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science Education, told reporters before the museum opened.]

 

I actually like this part… teachers shouldn’t lie to the children!

 

It should be against the law for teachers at a public school to be able to say that the earth is 14 billion years old when they can’t prove it! I think there should be a public debate with qualified people presenting both Creationism and Evolutionism. Then people would see the truth! Which is that they are both ‘theories’ that can’t be proven. If either should be taught in public schools, they should both be taught or niether and then as theories. To be fair, there probably isn’t enough Evolutionists or Creationists that agree (with each other), to form 2 teams for opposing views. On the other hand I am ambivalent about the spending of $27 million to prove that Genesis happened they way it reads… as far as I know it didn’t.
 

Posted in Religion and Philosophy | 3 Comments

« Previous Entries Next Entries »