iamonetruth blog

Senator Obama Is Not A Catholic Voter’s Choice
“Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” John 7:24

Senator Barack Obama is not a loving, caring Christian. His voting record and his stance on important issues show his true, selfish, nature.

from Senator Obama’s web site:
http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/060628-call_to_renewal_1/

“I think that we should put more of our tax dollars into educating poor girls and boys. I think that the work that Marian Wright Edelman has done all her life is absolutely how we should prioritize our resources in the wealthiest nation on earth. I also think that we should give them the information about contraception that can prevent unwanted pregnancies, lower abortion rates, and help assure that that every child is loved and cherished.” (This statement shows a lack of caring and love for the poor. For more information: Physicians For Life)

“But the reason the doctor was considering not voting for me was not simply my position on abortion. Rather, he had read an entry that my campaign had posted on my website, which suggested that I would fight “right-wing ideologues who want to take away a woman’s right to choose.”"
(Again, showing a lack of love for women.)

(This is a man who cares for… what(?), certainly not love of his fellow man.)
—

also from page: http://obama.senate.gov/speech/060628-call_to_renewal/

“But what they didn’t understand, however, was that I had to take Mr. [Alan] Keyes seriously, for he claimed to speak for my religion, and my God. He claimed knowledge of certain truths.

Mr. Obama says he’s a Christian, he was saying, and yet he supports a lifestyle that the Bible calls an abomination.

Mr. Obama says he’s a Christian, but supports the destruction of innocent and sacred life.

And so what would my supporters have me say? How should I respond? Should I say that a literalist reading of the Bible was folly? Should I say that Mr. Keyes, who is a Roman Catholic, should ignore the teachings of the Pope?

Unwilling to go there, I answered with what has come to be the typically liberal response in such debates - namely, I said that we live in a pluralistic society, that I can’t impose my own religious views on another, that I was running to be the U.S. Senator of Illinois and not the Minister of Illinois.”

(So, Senator Obama admits that he is for a “lifestyle” that is opposed to the “Bible” actually a lifestyle opposed to LOVE and that he is opposed to the teachings of the Catholic Church.)

—
http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Barack_Obama_Abortion.htm

from Source: 2008 Democratic Compassion Forum at Messiah College Apr 13, 2008:

“Undecided on whether life begins at conception
Q: Do you personally believe that life begins at conception?
A: This is something that I have not come to a firm resolution on. I think it’s very hard to know what that means, when life begins. Is it when a cell separates? Is it when the soul stirs? So I don’t presume to know the answer to that question. What I know is that there is something extraordinarily powerful about potential life and that that has a moral weight to it that we take into consideration when we’re having these debates.”
—
http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Barack_Obama_Abortion.htm

Expand access to contraception; reduce unintended pregnancy
AT A GLANCE
Reproductive Choice: Obama has been a consistent champion of reproductive choice and will make preserving a women’s right to choose under Roe v. Wade a priority as president. Obama also supports expanded access to contraception, health information and preventive services to reduce unintended pregnancies.
OBAMA’S PLAN
Protecting a Women’s Right to Choose: Obama will make safeguarding women’s rights under Roe v. Wade a priority. He opposes any constitutional amendment to overturn that decision.
Reducing Unintended Pregnancy: Obama will work to reduce unintended pregnancy by guaranteeing equity in contraceptive coverage, providing sex education, and offering rape victims accurate information about emergency contraception.
OBAMA RECORD
Throughout his career, in both the Illinois Senate & the US Senate, Obama has stood up for a women’s right to choose, consistently earning 100% ratings from pro-choice groups.
Source: Campaign booklet, “Blueprint for Change”, p. 35-36 Feb 2, 2008

Rated 100% by NARAL on pro-choice votes in 2005, 2006 & 2007
Sen. Obama received the following scores on NARAL Pro-Choice America’s Congressional Record on Choice.
2007: 100 percent
2006: 100 percent
2005: 100 percent

Voted against banning partial birth abortion
—
on Homosexuality
(He actually misuses the Bible!)

While, on his own web site, he states that people should use non religious support for their stance and then he changes his own stance by using, excuse me, I mean he changes his own position by “MIS”using the Bible to prove his point!
from his web site: “This brings me to my second point. Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God’s will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all.”
(It is a hard thing for me to trust a man who can not follow his own advice.)

from Catholic news agency:
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=11991

“”I don’t think it [a same-sex union] should be called marriage, but I think that it is a legal right that they should have that is recognized by the state,” said Obama. “If people find that controversial then I would just refer them to the Sermon on the Mount, which I think is, in my mind, for my faith, more central than an obscure passage in Romans.”"

(ME - Philip Turgati - www.iamonetruth.com)
If the Senator cared at all about those that consider themselves homosexual he would tell them the truth, in a loving, caring way. That being, that while a man can love a man and a woman can love a woman, erotic love between them is unnatural by simply looking at nature. While the bodies of men and women were naturally meant to compliment one another… that isn’t the case with the gay orientation. It is simple “common sense”. Something that seems to be sadly lacking in a selfish world.

A good friend sent me an email with a link to Sen. Obama’s speech on Race in America.

I sent the following reply. 

Hi! It is always good to hear from you.

I appreciate the email. It takes some courage to stand up for what we believe is right.
While I listened to the whole speech as best I could, I could not help seeing the direct correlation of Senator Obama’s issue on race and that of abortion.

He started his speech with our Nation’s “Founding Father’s” and the drawing up and signing of The Declaration of Independence. Declaring our Nation’s freedom from the oppression of the mighty power of England. We had no voice, under their yoke.

He mentioned, something that I didn’t know, that being, at the drawing up of “The Declaration” our Founding Fathers put off the question of slavery for 20 yrs. Many hearing his remarks would think that was a mistake.

That reminded me of the signing of Roe Vs. Wade. The Supreme Court put off the question of when human life begins.

Common Sense would dictate that the Justices should have answered that question first. Then, once the issue is clear, they can make an informed decision.

His speech was on Race in America. I found many of his remarks “fit” the abortion issue. I will only share a few here. Sen. Obama stated; “Race is an issue that we [America] simply can not ignore!”

Common Sense would say; “Abortion, that is, the plight of the unborn, is an issue that America can simply not afford to ignore!”
Just because Americans have the POWER to claim that a whole “class” of human beings are not human and do not deserve to live, that fact, does not give us the right to do so!

Sen. Obama draws his speech to a close by quoting a teaching of “the religions of the world”; “Do unto others as you would have others do unto you!”

I agree.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edikv0zbAlU

This stunning censored interview was cut from the TV program The Health Century due to its huge liability — the admission that the Merck drug company has been injecting cancer viruses into people worldwide.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Dr. Mercola

YOUTUBE

The fact that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) never sleeps should be a cause of our peace of mind, but people concerned for their health know differently.

It seems that they are at it again to make our food supply more dangerous. They want to change the labeling of certain foods that have been “irradiated” to “pasteurized”. Read more in an article by Erin Rosas, “Pasteurized ?  Preposterous!“, local Organic Grocers in Ocala, Florida.

“Grass fed beef can’t contain the specific kinds of E-coli that make humans sick, we protested!”

-

For more information on this important subject read here…  an article from The New York Times “Power Steer” By MICHAEL POLLAN

Here are some excerpts that may be of interest.

“We have come to think of ‘’cornfed'’ as some kind of old-fashioned virtue; we
shouldn’t. Granted, a cornfed cow develops well-marbled flesh, giving it a taste
and texture American consumers have learned to like. Yet this meat is
demonstrably less healthy to eat, since it contains more saturated fat. A recent
study in The European Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that the meat of
grass-fed livestock not only had substantially less fat than grain-fed meat but that
the type of fats found in grass-fed meat were much healthier. (Grass-fed meat
has more omega 3 fatty acids and fewer omega 6, which is believed to promote
heart disease; it also contains betacarotine and CLA, another ‘’good'’ fat.) A
growing body of research suggests that many of the health problems associated
with eating beef are really problems with cornfed beef. In the same way
ruminants have not evolved to eat grain, humans may not be well adapted to
eating grain-fed animals. Yet the U.S.D.A.’s grading system continues to reward
marbling — that is, intermuscular fat — and thus the feeding of corn to cows.”
[…]

“I thought about the deep pile of manure that No. 534 and I were standing in. We
don’t know much about the hormones in it — where they will end up or what
they might do once they get there — but we do know something about the
bacteria. One particularly lethal bug most probably resided in the manure
beneath my feet. Escherichia coli 0157 is a relatively new strain of a common
intestinal bacteria (it was first isolated in the 1980’s) that is common in feedlot
cattle, more than half of whom carry it in their guts. Ingesting as few as 10 of
these microbes can cause a fatal infection.”

“Most of the microbes that reside in the gut of a cow and find their way into our
food get killed off by the acids in our stomachs, since they originally adapted to
live in a neutral-pH environment. But the digestive tract of the modern feedlot
cow is closer in acidity to our own, and in this new, manmade environment acidresistant
strains of E. coli have developed that can survive our stomach acids –
and go on to kill us. By acidifying a cow’s gut with corn, we have broken down
one of our food chain’s barriers to infection. Yet this process can be reversed:
James Russell, a U.S.D.A. microbiologist, has discovered that switching a cow’s
diet from corn to hay in the final days before slaughter reduces the population of
E. coli 0157 in its manure by as much as 70 percent. Such a change, however, is
considered wildly impractical by the cattle industry.”

I hope that the information that I share is helpful for your healthy lifestyle.

I share information on my blog that should be a help to a healthy lifestyle both spiritually and physically.

Cartoon by Mike Adams - for more information check out NewsTarget.com

Good News Travels Fast!
Your activism just saved supplements from being turned into “untested drugs”!  Big Pharma will be back, but today, we can do a victory dance!
Click here for complete article…

Death by Medicine
By Gary Null, PhD; Carolyn Dean MD, ND; Martin Feldman, MD; Debora Rasio, MD; and Dorothy Smith, PhD

Summary of Codex Alimentarius 

Click to see an hilarious spoof based on the movie “Star Wars”… called “Store Wars”

“Don’t Panic - Eat Organic”

The FDA is using legal maneuvering to end your access to natural health products (like vitamins, minerals and herbs) and natural health therapies of all sorts. Again. This time, their ploy is to declare the therapies are “Medicine” so any non-physician who uses them will be practicing medicine without a license. Since these practices are “Medicine”, any products used would be untested drugs and therefore forbidden.
 
go to the link & sign the petition at the bottom of thepage.
 
http://tinyurl.com/2u7ghc          copy  and paste into the browser.
 
philip turgati
 
I did….’takes  30 seconds  and may be the best - nip it in the bud-   you ever did.

Texas Gov. orders anti-cancer vaccine
“Merck is bankrolling efforts to pass state laws across the country mandating Gardasil for girls as young as 11 or 12. It doubled its lobbying budget in Texas and has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country.”

Merck pharmaceutical strikes again!

Caution! Read more about Merck.  

Children of God for Life on Merck
On Vaccines From Aborted Fetuses